Correlation mechanism between structure and gasification characteristics of typical municipal solid waste (MSW) disposable bamboo chopsticks hydrochar
-
摘要: 本研究以MSW的典型成分一次性竹筷子(DBC)为原料,研究水热炭化(HTC)条件对DBC水热炭结构性质与气化反应特性的影响规律。结果表明,HTC提高了DBC的能量品质,水热处理后DBC-230-60的高位热值(HHV)是DBC的1.62倍,H/C和O/C从DBC的1.57和0.76下降到DBC-230-60的1.00和0.33。表征发现,水热炭和水热炭半焦的芳构化程度比DBC原样更高,水热炭的比表面积低于DBC原样,但水热炭半焦的比表面积却高于DBC原样半焦。相比于水热时间,水热温度对水热炭结构和气化反应性的影响更加显著。更高的水热温度增大了水热炭的芳构化程度,降低了水热炭的气化反应性。水热炭的气化反应性比DBC原样更差,主要是因为水热炭半焦芳构化程度增大对气化反应性的消极作用大于孔隙结构丰富的促进作用。Abstract: Due to the complex composition, large fluctuation of material characteristics and low energy density of MSW, the gasification characteristics of its hydrochars are not well understood. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the gasification characteristics of single component hydrochars. In this paper, a typical component of MSW, disposable bamboo chopsticks (DBC), was used as raw material to study the effect of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) conditions on the structural properties and gasification reaction characteristics of DBC hydrochars. The results showed that HTC improved the energy quality of DBC, the HHV of DBC-230-60 sample was 1.62 times of that of DBC, and H/C and O/C decreased from 1.57 and 0.76 of original sample to 1.00 and 0.33 of DBC-230-60. The results of characterization also demonstrate that the aromatization degree of hydrochar and hydrochar semicoke is higher than that of the DBC original one. The specific surface area of hydrochar is lower than that of DBC original sample, but hydrochar semicoke is higher than that of DBC original sample semicoke. Compared with hydrothermal time, hydrothermal temperature has the more significant effect on the structure and gasification reactivity of hydrochar. Higher hydrothermal temperature increases the aromatization degree of hydrochar and decreases the gasification reactivity of hydrochar. The gasification reactivity of hydrochar is worse than that of DBC original sample, which is mainly because the increase of the degree of semicoke arbulization of hydrochar has a greater negative effect on the gasification reactivity than the abundance of pore structure.
-
Key words:
- MSW /
- hydrochar /
- gasification behavior /
- reactivity
-
表 1 DBC的基本性质
Table 1 Basic properties of DBC
Sample Ultimate analysis wd/% Proximate analysis wd/% Atomic ratio QHHV /(MJ·kg−1) C H O N S A V FC O/C H/C DBC 45.85 6.01 46.43 0.6 0.36 0.75 85.48 13.76 0.76 1.57 14.63 表 2 水热炭制备的工况参数
Table 2 Operating parameters of hydrochar preparation
Sample Hydrothermal temp. /℃ Hydrothermal time t/min Stirring speed /(r·min−1) Heating rate /(℃·min−1) Solid-liquid ratio DBC-120-60 120 60 150 3 1∶10 DBC-180-60 180 60 150 3 1∶10 DBC-200-30 200 30 150 3 1∶10 DBC-200-60 200 60 150 3 1∶10 DBC-200-90 200 90 150 3 1∶10 DBC-230-60 230 60 150 3 1∶10 表 3 DBC水热炭的元素分析、原子比和碳的回收率
Table 3 Elemental analysis, atomic ratio and C recovery of DBC hydrocar
Sample Ultimate analysis wd/% Atomic ratio C recovery rate /% C H O N S O/C H/C DBC 45.85 6.01 46.43 0.60 0.36 0.76 1.57 100.00 DBC-120-60 48.41 6.10 44.92 0.46 0.08 0.72 1.51 82.55 DBC-180-60 52.29 6.10 41.03 0.54 0.02 0.59 1.40 65.86 DBC-200-30 52.98 5.86 40.59 0.54 0.02 0.58 1.33 66.12 DBC-200-60 54.79 5.85 38.76 0.58 0.01 0.53 1.28 67.41 DBC-200-90 53.90 5.96 39.51 0.58 0.04 0.55 1.32 67.97 DBC-230-60 65.25 5.43 28.64 0.67 0.00 0.33 1.00 60.68 表 4 DBC水热炭的工业分析、热值、能量密度和能量回收率
Table 4 Industrial analysis, HHV, energy density and energy recovery of DBC hydrochar
Sample Proximate analysis wd/% Atomic ratio QHHV /(MJ·kg−1) ED /% ERE /% A V FC O/C H/C DBC 0.75 85.48 13.76 0.76 1.57 14.63 100.00 100.00 DBC-120-60 0.03 91.09 8.88 0.72 1.51 15.88 108.54 84.86 DBC-180-60 0.02 87.29 12.70 0.59 1.40 17.90 122.35 65.10 DBC-200-30 0.01 83.60 16.39 0.58 1.33 17.91 122.42 57.25 DBC-200-60 0.01 81.00 18.99 0.53 1.28 18.85 128.84 59.37 DBC-200-90 0.01 83.07 16.93 0.55 1.32 18.55 126.79 56.90 DBC-230-60 0.01 65.35 34.64 0.33 1.00 23.70 162.00 54.48 表 5 XRD的结构参数
Table 5 Structural parameters of XRD
Sample Lc/nm Iπ/Iγ Aromaticity DBC 0.22 0.68 0.38 DBC-180-60 0.50 2.01 0.60 DBC-200-60 0.60 1.79 0.46 DBC-230-60 0.61 1.98 0.53 表 6 水热炭的比表面积及平均孔径
Table 6 Specific surface area and average pore size of hydrochar
Sample SBET/(m2·g−1) Average pore size /nm DBC 94.14 15.09 DBC-120-60 18.28 39.46 DBC-180-60 13.43 65.34 DBC-200-60 21.94 34.56 DBC-230-60 10.94 47.02 表 7 水热炭热解半焦的比表面积及平均孔径
Table 7 Specific surface area and average pore size of pyrolysis semi-coke of hydrochar
Sample SBET/(m2·g−1) Average pore size /nm DBC-900 117.80 2.50 DBC-120-60-900 540.60 1.65 DBC-180-60-900 510.71 1.59 DBC-200-60-900 515.29 1.60 DBC-230-60-900 475.74 1.61 -
[1] KAZA S, YAO L C, BHADA TATA P, VAN WOERDEN F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050[M]. Washington D. C: World Bank, 2018. [2] RENOU S, GIVAUDAN J G, POULAIN S, DIRASSOUYAN F, MOULIN P. Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity[J]. J Hazard Mater,2008,150(3):468−493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077 [3] 竹涛, 种旭阳, 王若男, 薛泽宇, 陈苗苗, 叶泽甫, 朱竹军. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰处理技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术,2022,28(7):189−201. doi: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.21080202ZHU Tao, ZHONG Xu-yang, WANG Ruo-nan, XUE Ze-yu, CHEN Miao-miao, YE Ze-fu, ZHU Zhu-jun. Research progress on the treatment technology of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash[J]. Clean Coal Technol,2022,28(7):189−201. doi: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.21080202 [4] LI Y, ZHAO X, LI Y, LI X. Waste incineration industry and development policies in China[J]. Waste Manage,2016,46:234−241. [5] 马盛伟, 朱磊, 李彬, 施沈杰. 城市生活垃圾生产现状及处置方式的研究进展[J]. 四川建材,2020,46(7):24−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4011.2020.07.012MA Sheng-wei, ZHU Lei, LI Bin, SHI Shen-jie. The research progress on the production status and disposal methods of municipal solid waste[J]. Sichuan Build Mater,2020,46(7):24−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4011.2020.07.012 [6] 杨华, 薛东卫, 赵运武, 任志宏. 浅论垃圾焚烧烟气处理技术[J]. 机械,2003,(5):4−6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2003.05.003YANG Hua, XUE Dong-wei, ZHAO Yun-wu, REN Zhi-hong. Discussion on waste incineration flue gas treatment technology[J]. Machinery,2003,(5):4−6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2003.05.003 [7] DIGMAN B, JOO H S, KIM D. Recent progress in gasification/ pyrolysis technologies for biomass conversion to energy: Sustainable energy[J]. Environ Prog Sustain,2009,28(1):47−51. doi: 10.1002/ep.10336 [8] AKBARIAN A, ANDOOZ A, KOWSARI E, RAMAKRISHNA S, ASGARI S, CHESHMEH Z A. Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass gasification in the path of circular bioeconomy[J]. Bioresour Technol,2022,362:127774. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127774 [9] SALMAN S, KALOGIROU S A, RANJBARI M, AMIRI H, MAHIAN O, BENYAMIN K, JAFARY T, NIZAMI A, GUPTA V K, AGHAEI S, PENG W, TABATABAEI M, AGHBASHLO M. Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev,2022,156:111975. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111975 [10] IRFAN M, LI A, ZHANG L, WANG M, CHEN C, KHUSHK S. Production of hydrogen enriched syngas from municipal solid waste gasification with waste marble powder as a catalyst[J]. Int J Hydrogen Energy,2019,44(16):8051−8061. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.048 [11] HU M, GUO D, MA C, HU Z, ZHANG B, XIAO B, LUO S, WANG J. Hydrogen-rich gas production by the gasification of wet MSW (municipal solid waste) coupled with carbon dioxide capture[J]. Energy,2015,90:857−863. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.122 [12] AYAS G, OZTOP HF. Thermal analysis of different Refuse Derived Fuels samples[J]. Therm Sci,2021,6(25):4395−4406. [13] TIAN W, WEI X, WU D, LI J, SHENG HZ. Analysis of ingredient and heating value of municipal solid waste[J]. J Environ Sci,2001,1(13):87−91. [14] ZHAO P, SHEN Y, GE S, CHEN Z, YOSHIKAWA K. Clean solid biofuel production from high moisture content waste biomass employing hydrothermal treatment[J]. Appl Energy,2014,131:345−367. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.038 [15] PENG C, ZHAI Y, ZHU Y, XU B, WANG T, LI C, ZENG G. Production of char from sewage sludge employing hydrothermal carbonization: Char properties, combustion behavior and thermal characteristics[J]. Fuel,2016,176:110−118. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.068 [16] ZHENG X, CHEN W, YING Z, JIANG Z, YE Y, WANG B, FENG Y, DOU B. Structure-reactivity correlations in pyrolysis and gasification of sewage sludge derived hydrochar: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Energy Fuels,2020,34(2):1965−1976. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b04275 [17] XIAO K, LIU H, LI Y, YI L, ZHANG X, HU H, YAO H. Correlations between hydrochar properties and chemical constitution of orange peel waste during hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Bioresour Technol,2018,265:432−436. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.014 [18] WEI J, GUO Q, DING L, YOSHIKAWA K, YU G. Synergy mechanism analysis of petroleum coke and municipal solid waste (MSW)-derived hydrochar co-gasification[J]. Appl Energy,2017,206:1354−1363. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.005 [19] KANG S, LI X, FAN J, CHANG J. Characterization of Hydrochars Produced by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignin, Cellulose, D-Xylose, and Wood Meal[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res,2012,51(26):9023−9031. doi: 10.1021/ie300565d [20] GAO Y, WANG X, WANG J, LI X, CHENG J, YANG H, CHEN H. Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth[J]. Energy,2013,58:376−383. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.023 [21] GULEC F, RIESCO L M G, WILLIAMS O, KOSTAS E T, SAMSON A, LESTER E. Hydrothermal conversion of different lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks-Effect of the process conditions on hydrochar structures[J]. Fuel,2021,302:121166. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121166 [22] ZHENG X, CHEN W, YING Z, HUANG J, JI S, WANG B. Thermodynamic investigation on gasification performance of sewage sludge-derived hydrochar: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Int J Hydrogen Energy,2019,44(21):10374−10383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.200 [23] MOSQUEDA A, WEI J, MEDRANO K, GONZALES H, DING L, YU G, YOSHIKAWA K. Co-gasification reactivity and synergy of banana residue hydrochar and anthracite coal blends[J]. Appl Energy,2019,250:92−97. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.008 [24] GUDUCU I, ALPER K, EVCIL T, TEKIN K, OHTANI H, KARAGOZ S. Effects of hydrothermal carbonization on products from fast pyrolysis of cellulose[J]. J Energy Inst,2021,99:299−306. doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2021.10.004 [25] LU X, PELLECHIA P J, FLORA J R V, BERGE N D. Influence of reaction time and temperature on product formation and characteristics associated with the hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose[J]. Bioresour Technol,2013,138:180−190. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.163 [26] SONIBARE O O, HAEGER T, FOLEY S F. Structural characterization of nigerian coals by X-ray diffraction, Raman and FT-IR spectroscopy[J]. Energy,2010,35(12):5347−5353. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.025 [27] SADEZKY A, MUCKENHUBER H, GROTHE H, NIESSNER R, PÖSCHL U. Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: Spectral analysis and structural information[J]. Carbon,2005,43(8):1731−1742. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 [28] ZHUANG X, ZHAN H, SONG Y, YIN X, WU C. Structure-reactivity relationships of biowaste-derived hydrochar on subsequent pyrolysis and gasification performance[J]. Energ Convers,2019,199:112014. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112014 [29] CAO X, PENG X, SUN S, ZHONG L, SUN R. Hydrothermal conversion of bamboo: Identification and distribution of the components in solid residue, water-soluble and acetone-soluble fractions[J]. J Agric Food Chem,2014,62(51):12360−12365. doi: 10.1021/jf505074d [30] BACH Q, SKREIBERG Ø. Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev,2016,54:665−677. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.014 [31] 林有胜. 基于组分基团的城市生活垃圾水热碳化机理及其应用基础研究[D]. 广东: 华南理工大学, 2018.LIN You-sheng. The research on the mechanism of high-grade fuel from municipal solid waste by hydrothermal carbonization and application studies of hydrochars[D]. Guangdong: SCUT, 2018. [32] JAMARI S S, HOWSE J R. The effect of the hydrothermal carbonization process on palm oil empty fruit bunch[J]. Biomass Bioenergy,2012,47:82−90. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.061 [33] 胡志锋. 微波预处理驱动下化学链气化小球藻制取合成气的机理研究[D]. 广东: 华南理工大学, 2016.HU Zhi-feng. The study on mechanism of chemical looping gasification of Chlorella vulgaris based on microwave pretreatment[D]. Guangdong: SCUT, 2016. [34] HASHAIKEH R, FANG Z, BUTLER I S, HAWARI J, KOZINSKI J A. Hydrothermal dissolution of willow in hot compressed water as a model for biomass conversion[J]. Fuel,2007,86(10-11):1614−1622. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.11.005 [35] GUO S, DONG X, WU T, SHI F, ZHU C. Characteristic evolution of hydrochar from hydrothermal carbonization of corn stalk[J]. J Anal Appl Pyrol,2015,116:1−9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.10.015 [36] LI X, HAYASHI J, LI C. FT-Raman spectroscopic study of the evolution of char structure during the pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal[J]. Fuel,2006,85(12-13):1700−1707. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.03.008 [37] XIN S, YANG H, CHEN Y, YANG M, CHEN L, WANG X, CHEN H. Chemical structure evolution of char during the pyrolysis of cellulose[J]. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis,2015,116:263−271. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.002 [38] SEVILLA M, FUERTES A B. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose[J]. Carbon,2009,47(9):2281−2289. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026 [39] BOURAOUI Z, JEGUIRIM M, GUIZANI C, LIMOUSY L, DUPONT C, GADIOU R. Thermogravimetric study on the influence of structural, textural and chemical properties of biomass chars on CO2 gasification reactivity[J]. Energy,2015,88:703−710. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.100