Study on mercury emission and migration from large-scale pulverized coal-fired boiler
-
摘要: 采用EPA 30B方法,对某大型火电厂四台典型煤粉锅炉进行了烟气Hg排放测试,并选取其中两台代表性锅炉对各输入/输出物料进行了Hg量对比分析.通过系统的汞质量平衡核算,得出各物料中汞所占的比例,并据此分析了选择性催化还原脱硝装置(SCR)、静电除尘器(ESP)和湿法脱硫装置(WFGD)等主要烟气净化设施对汞排放的影响,在此基础上研究得到系统汞的迁移规律.结果表明,四台锅炉的烟气Hg排放浓度都不高,普遍在3 μg/m3以下,明显低于新国标规定的排放限值,其中,配备SCR时Hg排放浓度明显更低.其原因在于,设置有SCR时,烟气中相当部分的Hg0会被催化氧化成Hg2+,Hg2+易于被飞灰吸附而脱除.WFGD对Hg2+的吸收比Hg0强得多,因此,排放烟气中汞的形态以Hg0为主,吸收的Hg绝大部分转移至脱硫石膏中.脱硫废水和炉渣对Hg的富集能力都非常有限.Abstract: In order to study the characteristics of mercury emission and migration, EPA 30B method was used to determine the Hg concentrations in flue gases emitted from four typical pulverized coal-fired boilers in a large-scale power plant, and the Hg contents of related input/output materials in two of these boilers were also analyzed and compared. According to mass balance, the Hg distribution in different materials was obtained, and then the effect of major flue gas purification systems including selective catalytic reduction (SCR), electrostatic precipitation (ESP) and wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) on Hg emission was clarified. Based on these, the migration pattern of Hg in pulverized coal-fired boilers was summarized systematically. Experimental results indicated that Hg emissions of all the four boilers were below 3 μg/m3, which was much lower than the limit specified by the new Chinese national standard. The emission was even significantly lowered when SCR system was located upstream. The reason was in the fact that, when there was SCR system located, lots of Hg0 in flue gas could be catalyzed to Hg2+ and then adsorbed by fly ash. The solubility of Hg2+ was much higher than that of Hg0 in WFGD system, and the major Hg speciation in exhaust flue gas was Hg0. Most of the Hg absorbed in WFGD was transferred into desulfurization gypsum, while the enrichment in both desulfurization waste water and bottom ash was limited.
-
LEE W, BAE G N. Removal of elemental mercury (Hg0) by nanosized V2O5/TiO2 catalysts[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43(5): 1522-1527. UDDIN M A, YAMADA T, OCHIAI R, and SASAOK E. Role of SO2 for elemental mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by activated carbon[J]. Energy Fuels, 2008, 22(4): 2284-2289. LI J F, YAN N Q, QU Z. Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury over the modified catalyst Mn-α-Al2O3 at lower temperatures[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44(1): 426-431. NRIAGU Q J, PACYNA J M. Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals[J]. Nature, 1988, 333(6169): 134-139. WU Y J, WANG S X, STREETS D G, HAO J M, CHAN M, JIANG J K. Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40(17): 5312-5318. 王运军, 段钰锋, 杨立国, 孟素丽, 黄治军, 吴成军, 王乾. 湿法烟气脱硫装置和静电除尘器联合脱除烟气中汞的试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(29): 64-69. (WANG Yun-jun, DUAN Yu-feng, YANG Li-guo,MENG Su-li, HUANG Zhi-jun, WU Cheng-jun,WANG Qian. Experimental study on mercury removal by combined wet flue gas desulphurization with electrostatic precipitator[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(29): 64-69.) 钟丽萍, 曹晏, 李文英, 潘伟平, 谢克昌. 燃煤电厂污染控制单元对汞释放的控制作用[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2010, 38(6): 641-646. (ZHONG Li-ping, CAO Yan, LI Wen-ying, PAN Wei-ping,XIE Ke-chang. Effect of the existing air pollutant control devices on mercury emission in coal-fired power plants[J]. Joumal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2010, 38(6): 641-646.) 陈进生, 袁东星, 李权龙, 郑剑铭, 朱燕群, 华晓宇, 何胜, 周劲松. 燃煤烟气净化设施对汞排放特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(2): 72-76. (CHEN Jin-sheng, YUAN Dong-xing, LI Quan-long,ZHENG Jian-ming, ZHU Yan-qun, HUA Xiao-yu, HE Sheng, ZHOU Jin-song. Effect of flue-gas cleaning devices on mercury emission from coal-fired boiler[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(2): 72-76.) YOKOYAMA T, ASAKURA K. Mercury emissions from a coal fired power plant in Japan[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2000, 259(1-3): 97-103. LICATA A, FEY W. Advanced technology to control mercury emission. A-DOE-EPRI Mega Symposium, Arlington Heights, Illinois, 2001, 8(20-24). ESWARAN S,STENGER H G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts[J]. Energy Fuels, 2005, 19(6): 2328-2334. KAMATA H, UEMO S I, NAITO T, YUKIMURA A. Mercury oxidation over the V2O5(WO3)/TiO2 commercial SCR catalyst[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2008, 47(21): 8136-8141. LEE C W, SRIVASTAVA R K, GHORISHI S B, HASTINGS T W, STEVENS F M. Investigation of selective catalytic reduction impact on mercury speciation under simulated NOx emission control conditions[J]. J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 2004, 54(12):1560-1566. 朱珍锦, 薛来, 谈仪, 张长鲁, 李永光, 章德龙, 王启杰, 潘丽华, 柯建新. 300 MW煤粉锅炉燃烧产物中汞的分布特征研究[J]. 动力工程, 2002, 22(1): 1594-1597. (ZHU Zhen-jin, XUE Lai, TAN Yi, ZHANG Chang-lu,LI Yong-guang, ZHANG De-long, WANG Qi-jie,PAN Li-hua, KE Jian-xin. Study on the mercury distribution of combustion products for 300 MW pulverized coal—fired boiler[J]. Power Engineering, 2002, 22(1): 1594-1597.) 杨立国, 段钰锋, 范晓旭. 汞在燃煤固态产物中的富集规律及其影响因素[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2010, 16(6): 485-490. (YANG Li-guo, DUAN Yu-feng, FAN Xiao-xu. Enrichment characteristics of mercury in solid products of coal-fired power plants and influencing factors[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2010, 16(6): 485-490.) 卢平, 吴江, 李传统. 100 MW燃煤电站汞排放及其形态分布[J]. 上海电力学院学报, 2009, 25(5): 473-477. (LU Ping, WU Jiang, LI Chuan-tong. Mercury emission and its speciation from a 100 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2009, 25(5): 473-477.) MILLER C, FEELEY T J, ALIOE W W. Mercury capture and fate using wet FGD at coal-fired power plant. DOE/NTEL Mercury and Wet FGD R&D Meeting, 2006, 8. AGARWAL H, STENGER H G. Effects of H2O, SO2, and NO on homogeneous Hg oxidation by Cl2[J]. Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(3): 1068-1075. 王运军, 段钰锋, 杨立国, 江贻满. 600 MW燃煤电站烟气汞形态转化影响因素分析[J]. 热能动力工程, 2008, 23(4): 399-403. (WANG Yun-jun, DUAN Yu-feng, YANG Li-guo,JIANG Yi-man. Factors affecting the transformation of Hg speciation for 600 MW coal—fired boiler[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2008, 23(4): 399-403.)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1744
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
- PDF下载量: 1125
- 被引次数: 0