Effect of solvent on the solvolysis liquefaction of sawdust with phosphotungstic acid under supercritical condition
-
摘要: 以可溶解于醇类的磷钨酸为催化剂, 在超临界醇体系下液化木屑, 探讨甲醇、乙醇、正丙醇、异丙醇等不同醇类溶剂对木屑醇解液化的影响, 同时采用FT-IR和GC-MS等对液化产物进行了表征分析.结果表明, 反应压力和溶剂的极性大小对木屑的液化效率以及液化产物影响显著.甲醇、乙醇、正丙醇、异丙醇反应体系的液化率和主要液化产物酯类化合物的含量比率, 分别为54.75%和43.759%、90.29%和23.531%、85.90%和41.761%、89.15%和28.619%, 特别在甲醇体系中, 乙酰丙酸甲酯的含量高达33.374%;在异丙醇体系中酚类化合物可达到24.342%;醛类化合物只出现在甲醇体系中.在正丙醇体系中没有酚类产物, 表明极性最小的正丙醇, 提供很少的H*, 更不容易将木质素降解.Abstract: Phosphotungstic acid is an efficient, green and highly acidic heterogeneous catalyst. Different from other solid heteropholy acids, phosphotungstic acid is dissoluble in alcohols. This research makes the best use of the physicochemical properties of phosphotungstic acid combining with high solubility of supercritical alcohols. Sawdust was liquefied in the supercritical solvent using phosphotungstic acid as catalyst. The effects of different solvents on the solvolysis liquefaction and the compositions of bio-oil were investigated. Each solvolysis experiment was conducted at 260℃ for 30min in a stainless-steel autoclave, in which 1g of fir sawdust, 0.5g of phosphotungsic acid, 150g of alcohol (such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol or iso-propanol) were added. The liquefaction products were separated by filtration after quenching the reaction. Then, the filtrate was extracted with n-hexane and separated into light bio-oil and heavy bio-oil after removing the solvent. Simultaneously, the residue, heavy bio-oil and light bio-oil were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Agilent 7890A/5975C gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results show that the reaction pressure and polarity of alcoholic solvents significantly impact the liquefaction efficiency and liquefaction products. The liquefaction yield using methanol, ethanol, n-propanol and iso-propanol is 54.75%, 90.29%, 85.90% and 89.15%, respectively, while the relative content of main compound esters in liquefaction products is 43.759%, 23.531%, 41.761% and 28.619%, respectively. Especially, the relative content of methyl levulinate in methanol system is 33.374%. The main compounds in liquefaction products using methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol as solvent are esters and phenols, while n-propanol system are esters, ketones and alcohols. Meanwhile, levulinate erster, which is produced through the reaction of cellulose/hemicellulose and alcohols, is detected in the liquefaction products of all four solvents. Phenols is determined in the liquefaction products in iso-propanol system with relative content of 24.342%. The aldehyde compounds only exist in methanol system. The absence of phenols in n-propanol system indicates that its weakest polarity provides less hydrogen radical and may lead to difficult degradation of lignin.
-
Key words:
- phosphotungstic acid /
- supercritical /
- alcoholysis /
- sawdust /
- liquefaction /
- effect
-
图 4 杉木屑(a)、甲醇的液化残渣(b)、乙醇的液化残渣(c)、正丙醇的液化残渣(d) 和异丙醇的液化残渣(e) 以及甲醇的产物重油(f)、乙醇的产物重油(g)、正丙醇的产物重油(h) 和异丙醇的产物重油(i) 的红外光谱谱图
Figure 4 Figure 4 FT-IR spectra of fir sawdust (a), the residue obtained from liquefaction with methanol (b), ethanol (c), n-propanol (d) and iso-isopropanol (e) the heavy oil obtained from liquefaction with methanol (f), ethanol (g), n-propanol (h) and isopropanol (i)
表 1 不同溶剂的实际反应温度、压力和液化率
Table 1 Comparison of liquefaction yield with different solvents
Solvent Methanol Ethanol n-propanol Isopropanol t /℃ 258-260 260-268 258-262 258-262 p / MPa 11.2-11.9 11.2-11.9 5.8-8.6 17.0-17.6 ηa/% 54.75 90.29 85.90 89.15 a: liquefaction yield determined by the average value of repeated experiments 表 2 不同溶剂条件下液化产物的组分种类及其GC总含量
Table 2 Major compositions and total relative content in the liquefaction products obtained by different solvents
Reaction
solventsGC content w/% alcohols aldehydes ketones acids phenols ethers esters others Methanol 1.041 2.605 1.539 0.961 15.780 0.571 43.759 25.93 Ethanol 0 0 23.398 0 19.873 0 23.531 13.708 n-propanol 13.177 0 14.105 6.445 0 4.031 41.761 11.340 Isopropanol 10.093 0 8.333 0 24.342 0 28.619 13.817 -
[1] 宋春财, 王刚, 胡浩权.生物质热化学液化技术研究进展[J].太阳能学报, 2004, 25(2): 242-248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX200402022.htmSONG Chun-cai, WANG Gang, HU Hao-quan. Review of biomass thermochemical liquefaction technology[J]. Acta Energy Sol Sin, 2004, 25(2): 242-248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX200402022.htm [2] 姜洪涛, 李会泉, 张懿.生物质高压液化制生物原油研究进展[J].化工进展, 2006, 25(1): 8-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGJZ200601002.htmJIANG Hong-tao, LI Hui-quan, ZHANG Yi. Review of preparation of crude oil by biomass high-pressure liquefaction[J]. Chem Ind Eng Prog, 2006, 25(1): 8-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGJZ200601002.htm [3] 王泽, 林伟刚, 宋文立, 姚建中, 鲁长波, 都林.生物质热化学转化制备生物燃料及化学品[J].化学进展, 2007, 19: 1190-1197. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXJZ2007Z2022.htmWANG Ze, LIN Wei-gang, SONG Wen-li, YAO Jian-zhong, LU Chang-bo, DU Lin. Preparation of biofuels and chemicals by biomass thermochemical conversion[J]. Chem Ind Eng Prog, 2007, 19: 1190-1197. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXJZ2007Z2022.htm [4] DUAN P, WANG B, XU Y. Catalytic hydrothermal upgrading of crude bio-oils produced from different thermo-chemical conversion routes of microalgae[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 186: 58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.050 [5] XU C, ETCHEVERRY T. Hydro-liquefaction of woody biomass in sub-and super-critical ethanol with iron-based catalysts[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(3): 335-345. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.013 [6] LIU H M, XIE X A, REN J L, SUN R C. 8-Lump reaction pathways of cornstalk liquefaction in sub-and super-critical ethanol[J]. Ind Crops Prod, 2012, 35(1): 250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.07.004 [7] LIU H M, LI M F, SUN R C. Hydrothermal liquefaction of cornstalk: 7-lump distribution and characterization of products[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 128: 58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.125 [8] AYSU T, KÜCÜK M M. Liquefaction of giant fennel (Ferula orientalis L.) in supercritical organic solvents: Effects of liquefaction parameters on product yields and character[J]. J Supercrit Fluids, 2013, 83: 104-123. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.09.001 [9] BRAND S, SUSANTI R F, KIM S K, SANG B I. Supercritical ethanol as an enhanced medium for lignocellulosic biomass liquefaction: Influence of physical process parameters[J]. Energy, 2013, 59: 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.049 [10] LIU D, LI Q, ZHAO A, SONG L, WU P, YAN Z. Hydro-liquefaction of sawdust and its three components in supercritical ethanol with Cl/NiCl2 catalyst[J]. Chem Eng J, 2015, 278: 921-928. http://or.nsfc.gov.cn/handle/00001903-5/196683 [11] 余先纯, 孙德林.超临界甲醇液化杉木工艺的探讨[J].林业科技, 2009, 34(5): 36-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYKJ200905010.htmYÜ Xian-chun, SUN De-lin. Explore of liquefaction of Chinese fir in supercritical methanol[J]. For Sci Technol, 2009, 34(5): 36-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYKJ200905010.htm [12] 李润东, 李秉硕, 杨天华, 谢迎辉.水稻秸秆在亚/超临界乙醇中的液化实验研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2013, 41(12): 1459-1465. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60006-2LI Run-dong, LI Bing-shuo, YANG Tian-hua, XIE Ying-hui. Experiment research of liquefaction of rice straw in sub/supercritical ethanol[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2013, 41(12): 1459-1465. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60006-2 [13] YOSHIDA T, MATSUMURA Y. Gasification of cellulose, xylan, and lignin mixtures in supercritical water[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2001, 40(23): 5469-5474. doi: 10.1021/ie0101590 [14] LIU Z G, ZHANG F S. Effects of various solvents on the liquefaction of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks[J]. Energy Convers Manage, 2008, 49(12): 3498-3504. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.009 [15] YUAN X Z, WANG J Y, ZENG G M, HUANG H J, PEI X K, LI H, LIU Z F, CONG M H. Comparative studies of thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of microalgae using different organic solvents[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(11): 6406-6412. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.031 [16] ZHANG L H, CHAMPAGNE P, XU C C. Bio-crude production from secondary pulp/paper-mill sludge and waste newspaper via co-liquefaction in hot-compressed water[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(4): 2142-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.029 [17] LU J, LI X Z, YANG R F, ZHAO J, LIU Y J, QU Y B. Liquefaction of fermentation residue of reed-and corn stover-pretreated with liquid hot water in the presence of ethanol with aluminum chloride as the catalyst[J]. Chem Eng J, 2014, 247(7): 142-151. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261138923_Liquefaction_of_fermentation_residue_of_reed-_and_corn_stover-pretreated_with_liquid_hot_water_in_the_presence_of_ethanol_with_aluminum_chloride_as_the_catalyst [18] WANG G, LI W, LI B Q, CHEN H K, BAI J. Direct liquefaction of sawdust under syngas with and without catalyst[J]. Chem Eng Process, 2007, 46(3): 187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2006.05.014 [19] XU J M, JIANG J C, DAI W D, XU Y. Liquefaction of sawdust in hot compressed ethanol for the production of bio-oils[J]. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2012, 90(4): 333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.001 [20] ZHOU L P, ZOU H J, NAN J X, WU L, YANG X M, SU Y L, LU T L, XU J. Conversion of carbohydrate biomass to methyl levulinate with Al2(SO4)3 as a simple, cheap and efficient catalyst[J]. Catal Commun, 2014, 50(18): 13-16. [21] 贺小亮, 蒋剑春, 姜小祥, 杨中志.预处理对松木屑液化效率及产物化学组分的影响研究[J].林产化学与工业, 2014, 34(1): 73-78. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCHX201401016.htmHE Xiao-liang, JIANG Jian-chun, JIANG Xiao-xiang, YANG Zhong-zhi. Effect of preteatment on Liquefaction of pine sawdust and chemical componts of product[J]. Chem Ind For Prod, 2014, 34(1): 73-78. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCHX201401016.htm [22] PENG L C, LIN L, LI H, YANG Q L. Conversion of carbohydrates biomass into levulinate esters using heterogeneous catalysts[J]. Appl Energy, 2011, 88(12): 4590-4596. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.049 [23] BRAND S, KIM J. Liquefaction of major lignocellulosic biomass constituents in supercritical ethanol[J]. Energy, 2015, 80: 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.043 [24] PETERSON A A, VOGEL F, LACHANCE R P, FRÖLING M, ANTAL J M J, TESTER J W. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub-and supercritical water technologies[J]. Energy Environ Sci, 2008, 1(1): 32-65. doi: 10.1039/b810100k